Legal Opinion
City of Bismarck v. Fettig
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1999No. 990133PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Kimberly Ann Fettig appealed from a district court judgment finding Fet-tig guilty of driving under the influence. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Kimberly Ann Fettig was charged by the City of Bismarck with Driving Under the Influence. On October 29, 1998, she appeared in Bismarck Municipal Court and pled not guilty. Prior to her plea, Fettig was given a document notifying her of her rights and including sections for her to fill out. After pleading, Fettig filled out the entire form except for a portion captioned “Jury Trial” and signed the form. The form had three options…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bartels v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Ex parte CorlissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. McCue v. BlaisdellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of LudlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Kelsh v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Sorum v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.