Legal Opinion

School-District No. Two v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Gladwin. (Cobb, J.) Asstvmpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

At the annual meeting of the school-district (plaintiff) held September 5, 1887, Isaac W. Devore was elected director and Isaac M. Hatch, assessor. The outgoing assessor was George D. Megiveron, and it *436was claimed that he had moneys in his hands belonging to the school-district, which he had not paid over to his successor or accounted for. The minutes of the said annual school-meeting in the record-book of the district were not signed by any one, and showed no adjournment whatever. Upon a fly-leaf of the same record-book was found, written in pencil, the following:

“School-House, District No.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Township of Taymouth v. KoehlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Rondot v. Rogers Tp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  3. Draper v. Village of SpringwellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Stout v. Yamhill CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Township of North Star v. CowdryMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API