School-District No. Two v. Clark
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gladwin. (Cobb, J.) Asstvmpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.
At the annual meeting of the school-district (plaintiff) held September 5, 1887, Isaac W. Devore was elected director and Isaac M. Hatch, assessor. The outgoing assessor was George D. Megiveron, and it *436was claimed that he had moneys in his hands belonging to the school-district, which he had not paid over to his successor or accounted for. The minutes of the said annual school-meeting in the record-book of the district were not signed by any one, and showed no adjournment whatever. Upon a fly-leaf of the same record-book was found, written in pencil, the following:
“School-House, District No.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Township of Taymouth v. KoehlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Rondot v. Rogers Tp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Draper v. Village of SpringwellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Stout v. Yamhill CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Township of North Star v. CowdryMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.