Legal Opinion
Rothstein v. Seidman & Seidman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 27, 1976No. 73 Civ. 2127, 73 Civ. 2129 to 73 Civ. 2132PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant Seidman and Seidman (“Seidman”) moves to dismiss various claims of amended complaints in five related actions 1 upon the ground that they either fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or fail to plead fraud with particularity as required by Rule 9(b), or are redundant.
These five actions (as well as five other actions not now before the court) were spawned by the 1971 failure of Axelrod & Co. (“Axelrod”), a securities broker-dealer and a former member of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Westminster Bank, U.S.A. v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Freschi v. Grand Coal VentureDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Attick v. Valeria Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Huang v. Sentinel Government SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.