Legal Opinion · Dissent

The State v. Domenge-Delhoyo

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 2016No. A16A0362Published

1DissentBarnes, Presiding Judge

Because the trial court should be affirmed on the alternative ground raised below that Domenge-Delhoyo was not timely advised of her implied consent rights, I respectfully dissent.10

“OCGA § 40-5-55 (a)[ ] provides that any person who operates a motor vehicle in this state and is arrested for DUI is deemed to have given consent to chemical tests of his bodily substances to determine the presence of alcohol or drugs.” Lee v. State, 324 Ga. App. 28, 29 (1) (749 SE2d 32) (2013). The purpose of providing the implied consent notice in accordance with OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (4) is to notify drivers of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Hough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  5. Garrett v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API