Legal Opinion
Miller v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1982No. 80-3376PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Miller and Lancaster, owners of a cafe and tavern (the tavern owners), brought this action against the Oregon State Liquor Commission (the commission), certain liquor wholesalers, and an association of liquor wholesalers (the wholesalers), contending that the pricing practices of Oregon beer and wine wholesalers, pursuant to administrative rules promulgated and enforced by the commission, violate section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The commission and the wholesalers moved to dismiss on the grounds that the antitrust claim was barred by the state action…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- A.K. Management Company, a Michigan Corporation v. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, a Federally Recognized Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Michael Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Miller v. HedlundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Charley's Taxi Radio Dispatch Corp. v. Sida of Hawaii, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1983
- Deak-Perera Hawaii, Inc. v. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.