Legal Opinion

In Re: Kraft Heinz Shareholder Derivative Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 31, 2023No. 1:20-cv-02259Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE KRAFT HEINZ SHAREHOLDER ) No. 20 C 2259 DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) ) Judge Jorge L. Alonso ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In these consolidated shareholder derivative actions, plaintiffs accuse numerous directors and officers of The Kraft Heinz Company (“Kraft Heinz” or “the company”), of making and causing the company to make misleading statements about the company’s performance amid imprudently aggressive cost-cutting efforts. According to plaintiffs, these misleading statements allowed some…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brooks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API