Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hennings
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") appeals the judgment entered upon the jury's verdict in favor of Krista Hennings in Hennings' action against Ricardo Flores and Allstate.
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
ISSUES
1. Whether the trial court erred in denying Allstate's motion to correct error because the amount of damages awarded was erroneous as a matter of law.
2. Whether the trial court erred in its instruction of the jury.
3. Whether the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence.
FACTS 1
At about 6:45 a.m. on October 24, 2000,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Sears Roebuck and Co. v. ManuilovIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Best Beers of Bloomington, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atkinson v. P & G-Clairol, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Kimberly S. Earl and the Estate of Jerry EarlIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Thorne v. Member Select InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Lee v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Thorne v. Member Select InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014