Legal Opinion

Ex parte Haralson & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ApplioatioNS to this court for writ of mandamus to Hon. John Moobb, Judge of the First Judicial Circuit, presiding at Perry Circuit Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

These cases are so connected, and dependent one upon the other, that we will consider them together.

These cases arose out of a contested claim of exemption, which had been interposed under section 2834, Code of 1876. *544Haralson & Co. and other creditors had sued out attachments against one Farrell, which were levied on a stock of merchandise. Farrell thereupon interposed his claim in writing under oath, that one thousand dollars in value of the merchandise was exempt to him, he being a resident of the State. This claim was lodged with the sheriff, who notified plaintiffs in the several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  2. Webb v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  3. Drinkwater v. HollidaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  4. Taylor v. B. Bank at HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Ex parte BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Woodward Iron Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Freider v. Lienkauff & StraussSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API