Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1967No. 3 Div. 258, 258-APublished

1DissentHill, Chief Justice

I cannot concur in either the reasoning or the conclusion and order of the majority of the Court in this cause. I think that the rule nisi should be issued in each case.

It is obvious that the majority opinion is based upon the premise, and the opinion so states, that a finding by this Court of an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court judge is a sine qua non to the issuance of the rule in cases where the rulings sought to be reviewed arise under the pre-trial deposition statute (Title 7, § 474(1) et seq., Code of Alabama Recompiled). Their opinion states: “In such cases” (where…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pinney v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Ex Parte WeissingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Wilson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Board of Education of Jefferson County v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API