Legal Opinion
Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. Bahr Consultants, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided July 30, 1999No. 3:97-cv-00899PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JARVIS, Chief Judge.
This is an action for damages for alleged violations of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and for alleged violations of the Insurance Trade Practices Act, Tennessee Code Annotated §§ 56-8-101, et seq. Plaintiff also seeks damages under state law for malicious disparagement and for tortious interference with prospective business advantage. 1 Essentially, plaintiff claims that defendant W. Hank Bahr (Bahr) made false and misleading statements concerning plaintiffs Employment Practices Liability (EPL) policy and its Directors and Officers…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Win Myint and wife Patti KI. Myint v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenneth Seaton v. TripAdvisor LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Linda Grubbs v. Sheakley Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- White Mule Co. v. ATC LEASING CO. LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- David H. McCord v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015