Cuthbert Burrel Co. v. Peoples's Ditch Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order restraining defendants from diverting more than a specified amount of water from a certain stream. George E. Church, Judge. Reversed. The facts, except those relating to the riparian character of the lands of plaintiffs, are the same as those stated in Stinson Canal & Irr. Co. v. Lemoore Canal & Irr. Co. et al., and Stinson Canal & Irr. Co. et al. v. People’s Ditch Co. et al., ante, p. 241.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The action arises out of conflicting claims to the use of the waters of Kings River. Plaintiffs had judgment and the appeal is by defendants, The People’s Ditch Company, The Last Chance Water Ditch Company, The Lemoore Canal and Irrigation Company and Lower Kings River Water Ditcb Company, from said judgment. The defendants, Lake Land Canal and Irrigation Company and the Union Water Ditch Company, have not appealed.
This action and two others (Stinson Canal & Irr. Co. v. Lemoore Canal & Irr. Co. et al., etc., Interveners, and Stinson Canal & Irr. Co. and Crescent Canal Co. v.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stinson Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Lemoore Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stinson Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Lemoore Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941