Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Methodist, Richard Young Hospital

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2000No. S-99-422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Richard Wilkinson, filed a petition alleging that the appellees Methodist, Richard Young Hospital (Methodist, Richard Young); Physicians Clinic; Loreen M. Riedler, M.D.; and D. McClean (collectively the appellees) invaded his privacy after employees of Methodist, Richard Young utilized its computer system to retrieve Wilkinson’s insurance information and filed a claim for treatment provided to his daughter. The district court sustained the appellees’ demurrer and dismissed the action without leave to amend. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Wilkinson filed a second amended petition alleging…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. Western R/C Flyers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Schoneweis v. DandoNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Prokop v. HochNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Miller v. American Sports Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hamilton v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Mulinix v. RobertsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API