Legal Opinion

Earle v. Salt Lake Utah R. Corporation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1946No. Nos. 6838-6840PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Chief Justice.

By stipulation the cases of the three plaintiffs were consolidated for trial, as all three cases involve the same factual situation, and the same evidence. Upon trial in the District Court of Salt Lake County, judgment against defendants was given in favor of each plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

Plaintiffs, all soldiers stationed at Camp Kearns, were passengers in an automobile driven by another soldier named Larsen. None of the passengers in the car knew one another, and none of them knew the driver. Larsen, driving into Salt Lake picked them up near the gate at Kearns.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Atwood v. Utah Light & Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Howe v. Minneapolis, Saint Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Lochhead v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Clark v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stickle v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wightman v. Mountain Fuel Supply CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Jensen v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hudson v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Shupe v. MenloveUtah Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API