Legal Opinion

Shupe v. Menlove

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1966No. 10405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This suit arises out of a written contract by which the defendant Roy A. Menlove agreed to build a house for the plaintiff at 1203 Yale Avenue in Salt Lake City for cost plus ten per cent. Upon a trial by jury of the various issues presented it found: (1) that defendant had substantially performed; (2) that his reasonable cost plus ten per cent totaled $43,000; (3) that his request for reasonable attorney fees, costs and certain other disbursements was without merit; and (4) plaintiff was entitled to an offset of $1,230.22 damages for defendant’s failures to fully perform.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Boyles Bros. Drilling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Page v. Federal Security Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bloomquist v. Buffelen Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wilson v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Earle v. Salt Lake Utah R. CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 2 Ton Plumbing, L.L.C. v. ThorgaardUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Johnson v. SimonsUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bartlett Electric, Inc. v. BallardUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Johnson v. SimonsUtah Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API