Atwood v. Utah Light & Railway Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action by lone Atwood against ITtab Light & Railway Company. Judgment for Plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
price:, j.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries which she claimed were sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff, an *368unmarried woman of thirty-six years of age at the time of the accident, was riding in a topless single-seated buggy with one Samuel J. Lindsay, thirty years of age, and with her sister. They were driving north on State Street and south of the corporate limits of Salt Lake City on the evening of June 14, 1912, between eight and nine o’clock. The horses were owned by Mr. Lindsay and were hitched to the buggy, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Howe v. Minneapolis, Saint Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Lochhead v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Sharp v. SproatSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Pauly v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.