Shannon v. New York City Transit Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants the New York City Transit Authority (the “NYCTA”) and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (“MABSTOA”) (collectively, the “Authorities”), have moved for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Curtis Shannon (“Shannon”) alleging disability discrimination under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Shannon has cross-moved for summary judgment granting the relief sought in the complaint and to strike portions of the affidavit of Stephen A. Vidal, Chief Officer, Safety, Training and Performance for the NYCTA’s Department of Buses. For…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Robert N. Colwell, Charles R. Ellinger and Richard H. Abrams, Jr. v. Suffolk County Police Department, County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burton v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Zakre v. Norddeutsche Landesbank GirozentraleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Shannon v. New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Shannon v. New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.