Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 20, 2002No. Nos. 01-15410, 01-15976, 01-15977PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals involve monocular employees of United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) who wanted to drive small trucks and vans but are not qualified to do so under a vision protocol that UPS developed when the Department of Transportation (DOT) removed vehicles weighing less than 10,001 pounds from its own vision safety standards. At least two of these employees filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which issued a reasonable-cause determination. The EEOC then brought this action under the Americans with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Hubert Wooten v. Farmland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, James Aikens James Francis Chris Wilson Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellees v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and James Aikens James Francis Chris Wilson Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellants v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and James Aikens, Intervenor v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002