Legal Opinion

L'Hommedieu v. Wilfred Wolfson Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1932No. 29,114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. At the close of the evidence the court granted a motion by the defendants to instruct the jury to return a verdict in their favor. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied, and this appeal followed.

The assignments of error are: (1) That the court erred in directing a verdict against the plaintiff; (2) that said directed verdict is contrary to the evidence and to law. The record presents the one question of whether the court erred in directing a verdict for defendants.

The court may dismiss au action on the trial, after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reinkey v. Findley Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Minneapolis Baseball Co. v. City BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Smith v. AltierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Foster v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Diamon v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schimmelpfennig v. GaedkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Janet Schaeper, a Minor, by and Through Her Father, Next Friend and Natural Guardian, Robert Schaeper v. Harold M. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  3. Schutte & Koerting Co. v. FischerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Sworski v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API