Legal Opinion
American Marine Upholstery Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 14, 1965No. 300-63PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARAMORE, Judge.
Plaintiff in this action contends (1) that defendant breached a supply contract in that proper procedures were not followed by defendant in terminating the contract for default, and (2) that it is entitled to payment for 60 undelivered chairs and for 300 chairs rejected as defective. Defendant has filed counterclaim for excess costs incurred in re-letting the terminated contract.
Plaintiff has filed motion for judgment on the pleadings and defendant has moved for summary judgment dismissing the petition and granting judgment for defendant on its counterclaim.
The facts as shown…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- P.L.S. Coat & Suit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Josephine C. Rumley, Administratrix of the Estate of George S. Rumley D/B/A George S. Rumley Shoe Manufacturing Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Zoda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- W. G. Cornell Company of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Empire Energy Management Systems, Inc. v. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.