Anzaldua v. Band
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
We granted leave in this case to decide whether there is a right to trial by jury in an action under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act. MCL 15.361 el seq.-, MSA 17.428(1) el seq. If the right does exist, does it obtain when the defendant is the state or one of its political subdivisions? We hold that the act contains a right to a jury trial, and that the right exists in suits against the state of Michigan and its subdivisions. We thus affirm the result reached by the Court of Appeals, but for a different reason.
i
Plaintiff began an action under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act in circuit…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Debano-Griffin v. Lake CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Commonwealth Department of Agriculture v. VinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.