Legal Opinion

Anzaldua v. Band

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1998No. Docket Nos. 106469, 106471, Calendar No. 12PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

We granted leave in this case to decide whether there is a right to trial by jury in an action under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act. MCL 15.361 el seq.-, MSA 17.428(1) el seq. If the right does exist, does it obtain when the defendant is the state or one of its political subdivisions? We hold that the act contains a right to a jury trial, and that the right exists in suits against the state of Michigan and its subdivisions. We thus affirm the result reached by the Court of Appeals, but for a different reason.

i

Plaintiff began an action under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act in circuit…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Debano-Griffin v. Lake CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth Department of Agriculture v. VinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API