Belmar Contracting Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Claim for damages for alleged breaches by the state of a contract for highway construction.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Claimant is a highway contractor and the claim is for damages for alleged breaches by the state of a contract for highway construction entered into between the claimant and the state. The contract was for the construction of a section of a state highway one and seventeen one-hundredths miles in length entirely within the city of Hudson upon and over city streets. Under an arrangement with the city of Hudson, to which claimant was not a party and with which claimant had nothing to do, almost all of the moneys which were to be paid for the work to be done under the contract were to be furnished…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pratt v. . Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Garfielde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Brooklyn Central Rail Road v. Brooklyn City Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1860
- Disken v. HerterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Lynch v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Studer v. RasmussenWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- O'Connor v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Peter F. Connolly Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1923