Legal Opinion
Considine Co. v. Shadle, Hunt & Hagar
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1986No. D003506PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEWIS, J.
The Considine Company, Inc., and Considine Vineyard Company, cross-complainants and appellants (Considine), appeal from a sum mary judgment dismissing their cross-complaint against cross-defendants and respondents Shadle, Hunt & Hagar, Ernest L. Hunt, Jr., and James L. Hagar (SH&H). For the reasons set forth below we must reverse the judgment.
Facts
On August 1, 1979, Considine entered into a lease of restaurant space with George Moulios and his wife Concetta. The leased premises were located in Considine’s Vineyard shopping center. The lease included the right to use patio…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- GEM Developers v. Hallcraft Homes of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Schneider National, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Kandik Construction, Inc. & AssociatesAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Superior, Inc. v. Behlen Mfg. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Topa Ins. Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.