Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Eden v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1939No. 8,001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner, Carl F. Eden, here seeks a writ restraining the defendant district judge from proceeding with the trial of the cause wherein Frank Cassels is plaintiff and Andrew O'Connell and A. Grorud are defendants, now pending and at issue in the District Court of Jefferson County, Montana. The petitioner intervened in the district court action. An alternative writ issued. The defendants are represented here by counsel for the plaintiff in the district court action and appeared by motion to quash and by answer. A somewhat lengthy recital of the facts is essential here to a proper…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carleton v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Nissler v. DonlanMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Coonan v. LoewenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Washoe Copper Co. v. HickeyMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State ex rel. Carroll v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kohne v. YostMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Stefonick v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. L. HoguesMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Kohne v. YostMontana Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API