Anthem Health Plans of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of Insurance
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.
[¶ 1] Anthem Health Plans of Maine, Inc., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (Anthem), appeals from the judgment entered in the Business and Consumer Docket {Humphrey, C.J.) pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80C affirming a decision by the Superintendent of Insurance (1) determining that Anthem’s proposed rate increase for its individual health insurance products — an increase of 9.2% that contained a built-in risk and profit margin of 8% for those products — was excessive and unfairly discriminatory; and (2) indicating that an average rate increase of 5.2%, containing a built-in risk and profit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paul A. Dyer v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- In Re Blue Cross and Blue Shield 2022 Individual & Small Group Market FilingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- Patricia H. Parks Monteith v. George H. Monteith Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- FEDEQ DV004 LLC v. CITY OF PORTLANDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022