Legal Opinion

Jane Does 1-10 v. University of Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 15, 2020No. 2:16-cv-01212Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 JANE DOES 1-10, et al., CASE NO. C16-1212JLR 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION v. FOR CLASS DECERTIFICATION 12 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, 13 et al., 14 Defendants. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendant David Daleiden’s motion to decertify or narrow that 17 class and subclasses that the court previously approved. (MTD (Dkt. # 215); see also CC 18 Order (Dkt. # 172).) Plaintiffs John and Jane Does 1-8 (collectively, “Doe Plaintiffs”) 19 oppose Mr. Daleiden’s motion. (Does Resp. (Dkt. #…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API