Legal Opinion

C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 17, 1961No. 65455; protest 60/20421 (Buffalo)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

Certain merchandise invoiced as “Diversol Chlorinated Trisodium Phosphate” was classified as a chemical compound, not specially provided for, under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, and' *423assessed with duty at the rate of 10% per centum ad valorem. The importer herein claims that the merchandise is properly classifiable under paragraph 13 of the tariff act, as modified by T.D. 54108, supra, under a provision for “Blackings, powders, liquids, and creams for cleaning or polishing, not…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API