Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aceto Chemical Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 17, 1967No. C.D. 3058Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Oliver, Judge:

I respectfully dissent from the view of my colleagues in this case because I feel that the record fails to support either claim advanced by the plaintiff herein.

Accepting as inappropriate the official classification, it of course remained plaintiff’s burden to establish by competent and sufficient evidence the propriety of its own claims.

The testimony of plaintiff’s witness Mann, president of the importer, indicates that he was in the chemical business, manufacturing and importing, and that he imported this merchandise and sold it to a *29shampoo company. He was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API