State v. Vallejos
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, Chief Justice.
This case involves the subject of “use,” or “derivative use,” immunity granted to a witness compelled to testify at a hearing or other proceeding when the witness is also accused of a crime and therefore entitled to the protection afforded by the privilege against self-incrimination. We discussed the subject in State v. Munoz, 103 N.M. 40, 702 P.2d 985 (1985), in which we adopted the principles outlined in Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 92 S.Ct. 1653, 32 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972) (upholding constitutionality of federal use immunity statute). In Munoz we…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BelangerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CARAPEZZASupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.