Legal Opinion

State v. Vallejos

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1994No. 20710PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Chief Justice.

This case involves the subject of “use,” or “derivative use,” immunity granted to a witness compelled to testify at a hearing or other proceeding when the witness is also accused of a crime and therefore entitled to the protection afforded by the privilege against self-incrimination. We discussed the subject in State v. Munoz, 103 N.M. 40, 702 P.2d 985 (1985), in which we adopted the principles outlined in Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 92 S.Ct. 1653, 32 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972) (upholding constitutionality of federal use immunity statute). In Munoz we…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BelangerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CARAPEZZASupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API