Legal Opinion
In re Sugarman
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1933No. 22654PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion to confirm the report of the referee, which sustained the first and second specifications of objection to the discharge of the bankrupt, and recommended that the bankrupt be refused a discharge.
The first specification of objection charged that the bankrupt made a false statement in writing to the Reliance Investment Corporation, for the purpose of obtaining credit, and obtained credit thereon.
The second specification of objection charged that the bankrupt, in the course of proceedings in bankruptcy of the Sugarman’s Department Store, Inc., of which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- In Re SlocumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In re Dresser & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1905
- In re LesserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Morris Plan Bank of Richmond v. HendersonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re StraussDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933
- In re MargolisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- In re MadwayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- In re ErnstDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939