In re Margolis
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
In my memorandum of January 30, 1936,1 the first specification was disposed of. The sole remaining question is whether the second specification has been proved. I shall deal only with that matter in the present memorandum.
As a preliminary we should get in mind certain facts, which are undisputed or incontrovertibly established; also certain applicable propositions of law which are indisputable. These will be set out briefly.
All the events involved transpired in 1930. The period with which we are concerned is January 1 to September 22. That will be called the accounting…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cornett v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Lessee of Sicard v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Karger v. SandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Winn v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- In Re MonschDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re StineDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
- Central Trust Co. v. Yawnick (In Re Yawnick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1982