Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Watson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1930No. 4 Div. 448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Petitioner is complainant in a bill for divorce against her husband, and by this mandamus proceeding seeks a review of the chancellor's decree in that cause fixing alimony pendente lite and solicitor’s fees. That she has pursued the proper remedy for such review is not questioned. Ex parte Cairns, 209 Ala. 358, 96 So. 246; Ex parte Eubank, 206 Ala. 8, 89 So. 656.

Following the interposition of demurrer by respondent, the original petition was amended and the record perfected, and that the demurrer refiled to the amended petition is not well taken is quite clear and needs no discussion.

By…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brindley v. BrindleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Ex Parte EubankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Ex Parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Norrell v. NorrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Ex parte TranumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API