Legal Opinion

Shore v. Minter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1924No. 24,081PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for personal injuries wherein there was a verdict for plaintiff, a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict which was denied, and judgment accordingly for plaintiff. From that judgment defendants appeal.

The only question here is whether there was any evidence to support the verdict.

*216In company with her sister and a gentleman Mend, plaintiff was standing at the northwest corner of the intersection of Lyndale and Hawthorne avenues in Minneapolis at about 9 p. m. of May 29, 1922. Plaintiff, as she was standing with one foot on the curb and the other in the driveway, or as she had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Provinsal v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. Feyrer v. DurbrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. EvertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Pollock v. McCormickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Cheadle v. JamesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Grantham v. Watson Bros. TransportationNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Pach v. Chippewa Springs CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API