Legal Opinion

Cheadle v. James

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1930No. 28,038PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Defendant made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict but made no motion for a new trial. The motion was denied, judgment entered, and defendant appealed therefrom. Defendant contends that the evidence fails to show any negligence on his part, and conclusively shows contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

Plaintiff was employed by the state highway department and with a team and small grader cared for a section of trunk highway No. 6 which runs in a north and south direction in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dehaan v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Cunnien v. Superior Iron Works Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Sorenson v. SandersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Chandler v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Ruddy v. IngebretSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Murray v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Engstrom v. De WittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API