Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Lawrence Redevelopment Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 30, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutteb, J.

This is a petition under G. L. c. 79 for the assessment of damages resulting from the authority’s taking of about seventeen acres of land in Lawrence (the locus) zoned for industrial purposes. The authority being dissatisfied with the verdict brings the case here on exceptions.

1. , There was no abuse of discretion in the action of the judge in receiving de bene, at the outset of the trial, evidence about sales of four parcels in the Lawrence-North Andover area. Evidence was offered later that all the four parcels were comparable with the locus, although, at the time when testimony concerning…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clarke v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Horowitz v. BokronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Ramacorti v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Brush Hill Development, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Iris v. Town of HinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. RancourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Dixie's Bar, Inc. v. BOSTON LICENSING BOARDMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. Roach v. Newton Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Lee v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API