Legal Opinion

Colvert v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 12, 1974No. 1 CA-IC 822PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

This review of an award of the Industrial Commission raises the issue of whether the “aggressor rule" when used in the context of employee fights is a defense to compensability for injuries arising from such fights.

The facts pertinent to this case are as follows: Petitioner, Gary L. Colvert, was employed by respondent, Grant Road Lumber Company on July 9, 1971. . Five days later petitioner and other workers were involved in the task of unloading sticky and scratchy insulation from a flatbed truck parked in the employer’s yard. Petitioner and a co-worker…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Crotty v. Driver Harris Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Petro v. Martin Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Glodo v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. United States Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Springston v. IML Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API