United States v. Banks
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CARMICHAEL, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas before an officer-enlisted member general court-martial, appellant was convicted of three specifications of aggravated assault in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The members found him not guilty of one specification of assault consummated by a battery. Appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for two years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private E1. The convening authority approved the sentence.
Appellate defense…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. TeeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. TeeterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. NewsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. NewsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988