Legal Opinion

United States v. Banks

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 19, 1989No. ACMR 8801213Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARMICHAEL, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas before an officer-enlisted member general court-martial, appellant was convicted of three specifications of aggravated assault in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The members found him not guilty of one specification of assault consummated by a battery. Appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for two years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private E1. The convening authority approved the sentence.

Appellate defense…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. TeeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. TeeterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. NewsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. NewsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API