Legal Opinion

Vill. of Bratenahl v. Osredkar

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2017No. 104916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶ 1} The village of Bratenahl appeals the dismissal of two consolidated cases. We reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

{¶ 2} Michael Osredkar was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol/drugs, in violation of Bratenahl Codified Ordinance 333.01(A)(1)(a); driving under the influence of alcohol/drugs breath .08-.17, in violation of Bratenahl Codified Ordinance 333.01(A)(1)(d); and driving in marked lanes in violation of Bratenahl Codified Ordinance 333.08. Daniel Evans was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol/drugs, in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. ParsonOhio Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NewtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API