Legal Opinion

Birnel v. Town of Fircrest

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1959No. 34857Published

1Opinion of the Court

53 Wn.2d 830 (1959)

335 P.2d 819

PATRICIA I. BIRNEL, Appellant,

v.

THE TOWN OF FIRCREST, Respondent.[1]

No. 34857.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 26, 1959.

McMicken, Rupp & Schweppe, Mary Ellen Krug, and Fredric C. Tausend, for appellant.

Crippen & Flynn, for respondent.

2Per curiam

Plaintiff commenced this action to have ordinance No. 323 of the town of Fircrest declared unconstitutional and to enjoin the town from adding to the city water supply

"... a source of fluoridation approved by the State Department of Health ... under the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health, such…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaul v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Birnel v. Town of FircrestWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Iverson v. PetermanWashington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API