Legal Opinion
Birnel v. Town of Fircrest
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1959No. 34857PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff commenced this action to have ordinance No. 323 of the town of Fircrest declared .unconstitutional.and,to enjoin the town from adding to the city water supply
“. . . a source of fluoridation approved by the State Department of Health . . . under the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health, such addition to be administered in a manner approved by the State Department of Health.”
A demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s amended complaint; she elected not to plead further and now appeals from a judgment dismissing her action with prejudice.
The judgment is affirmed on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kaul v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by12 opinions
- Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Graybeal v. McNevinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Alkire v. CashmanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
- Wilson v. City of Mountlake TerraceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Paduano v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.