Armstrong v. City of Melvindale
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOK, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants, Southgate Police Officers David Fobar and Brad Gratz, appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment with respect to: (1) Plaintiffs-Appellees’ claim of a Fourth Amendment violation, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arising out of Defendants’ execution of a search warrant on the premises of Plaintiffs’ business, and (2) their defense of qualified immunity. Because we find that a reasonable'person in the officers’ position would not have known that his conduct violated a clearly established right, we reverse the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Thomas Leonard v. Stephen Robinson, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Zucker v. City of Farmington HillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Dwain Barton v. Officer MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- O'Brien v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.