State v. Sanchez-Granado
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Opinion
2Per curiam
¶ 1 Javier Sanchez-Granado appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, a second degree felony. Sanchez-Granado entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.
¶2 Sanchez-Granado claims that the district court erred by (1) adopting the subjective view of one of the police detectives rather that applying an objective standard and (2) failing to consider the “numerous innocent explanations of [his] actions within the totality of the circumstances.”…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- State v. WarrenUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MarklandUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FullerUtah Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018