Legal Opinion
State v. Warren
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 2003No. 20020002PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals
¶ 1 This case concerns the standard for determining the reasonableness of a protective frisk ("Terry frisk") for weapons. At trial, the defendant, Eric Jarvis Warren, filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained in a Terry frisk performed during a routine traffic stop. Although the officer who performed the frisk testified that he had no reason to believe Warren was armed and dangerous, the trial court denied the motion,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LevinUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.