Legal Opinion
Duplicator Mfg. Co. v. Heyer
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 12, 1922No. 3030PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVAN A. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant charged infringement of United States letters patent No. 965,887 to Elanigan for a multiple copying machine. In the District Court the bill was dismissed for want of equity. On the 42 claims of- the patent, infringement is alleged of but one, which is:
“42. In a multiple copying machine, the combination with a machine frame, having on one side thereof a journal bearing and on the opposite side a chuck, of a duplicating hand, and a spool on which said duplicating hand is wound, said spool having at each end a squared chuck-engaging member and cylindrical…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Connecticut Telephone & Electric Co. v. Automotive Equipment Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1926
- Heyer Duplicator Co. v. Ditto, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925