Legal Opinion

Duplicator Mfg. Co. v. Heyer

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 12, 1922No. 3030PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVAN A. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant charged infringement of United States letters patent No. 965,887 to Elanigan for a multiple copying machine. In the District Court the bill was dismissed for want of equity. On the 42 claims of- the patent, infringement is alleged of but one, which is:

“42. In a multiple copying machine, the combination with a machine frame, having on one side thereof a journal bearing and on the opposite side a chuck, of a duplicating hand, and a spool on which said duplicating hand is wound, said spool having at each end a squared chuck-engaging member and cylindrical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Connecticut Telephone & Electric Co. v. Automotive Equipment Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1926
  3. Heyer Duplicator Co. v. Ditto, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API