Legal Opinion

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1936No. S. F. No. 15566PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff sued the defendant state treasurer for the sum of $4,325.87, as a portion of the tax assessed against it in the year 1934 by the state board of equalization under the provisions of section 14 of article XIII of the Constitution and paid under protest. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed. The cause is presented on an agreed statement of facts.

The plaintiff is an insurance company doing business in this state. As such it is and was at the time herein involved required by the provisions of section 14 of article XIII of the Constitution to pay…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Southern California Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Consolidated Title Securities Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. J. C. Penney Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Pacific Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. J. C. Penney Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API