Legal Opinion
Pazol v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 23, 1964No. 40832PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
Prior to the enactment of the Uniform Commercial Code (Ga. L. 1962, p. 156 et seq.; Code Title 109A), the law in this State with regard to the present situation was expressed in Pike v. First Nat. Bank of Rome, 99 Ga. App. 598 (1) (109 SE2d 620), as follows: “The deposit by a customer in a bank of a check to the credit of the depositor gives rise to the presumption, as between the parties, that the bank is the collecting agency of the depositor. And even though there is an express agreement to that effect, where, however, it is the custom of the bank to credit such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pike v. First National Bank of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Waynesboro Planing Mill v. Perkins Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Mutual Fertilizer Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Wiggins v. First Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Home Finance Co. of Rome, Georgia, Inc. v. Bank of LafayetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Union Circulation Co. v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- United Overseas Bank v. Veneers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Citizens National Bank of Englewood v. Fort Lee Savings & Loan AssociationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Waltham Citizens National Bank v. FlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Long Island National Bank v. ZawadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.