Legal Opinion

Waynesboro Planing Mill v. Perkins Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1926No. 16696PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A parol contract unenforceable by reason of the statute of frauds is nevertheless a valid, subsisting contract as between persons other than the contracting parties, for purposes other than a recovery upon it. Cowan v. Adams, 10 Me. 374 (25 Am. D. 242) ; Draper v. Wilson, 143 Wis. 510 (128 N. W. 66, 21 Ann. Cas. 1387) ; 25 K. C. L. 732, § 380, and cases cited.

2. Where a deed to realty contains a provision making the deed subject to an existing timber lease, and where one claiming through the lessee the title to timber institutes a suit in trover against a strangePto recover the timber, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Draper v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cowan v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1833

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Pazol v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Mickle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. McRae v. WilbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Irwin v. DaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API