Legal Opinion
Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 25, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGINLEY, Judge.
PECO Energy Company (PECO), Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Association (MAPSA) and Frank A. Salvatore (Salvatore) (collectively, Petitioners), seek review of the Public Utility Commision’s (PUC) order which, inter alia, promulgated procedures for full implementation of retail choice by consumers of electricity (customers).1 This Court has consolidated these cases for review.2
On April 24, 1998, the PUC entered a tentative order that outlined a procedure whereby electric distribution companies (Distributors) enrolled customers into the Pennsylvania Electric Choice Program pursuant to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Department of Environmental Resources v. Rushton Mining Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Chimenti v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Their Members v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- PLEASANT HILLS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Public Auditorium Auth.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- M. Collins v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- West Penn Power Co. v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019