Legal Opinion

People v. Layman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1968No. Crim. 2965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

Defendants were convicted of the offense of grand theft; applied for and were granted probation; and appeal from the conviction. Defendant Layman was an estimator and defendant Perusse was a licensed inspector employed by Countywide Termite Control, Inc., which was engaged in the business of repairing damage caused by and controlling termite infestation. On November 9, 1966 defendants obtained permission from Vera Wicker to inspect her residence for termite damage; purportedly conducted such an inspection; falsely reported to her the extent of alleged termite damage and the urgent need for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. CamodecaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SiegenthalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. TrasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. De PriestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API