Legal Opinion

People v. Siegenthaler

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1972No. Crim. 15541PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Henry Lawrence Siegenthaler appeals from a judgment upon a conviction of burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) We hold, contrary to defendant’s contentions, that evidence seized at the time of his arrest infringed no constitutional right, that an extrajudicial statement was properly received in evidence, and that defendant was not denied a right of self-representation at trial.

The record, when viewed in the light most favorable to the judgment (People v. Newland (1940) 15 Cal.2d 678, 681 [104 P.2d 778]), discloses that at 2:45 a.m. officers in a marked police vehicle stopped at an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. People v. McDanielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API