People v. Traster
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Appellant, Kevin D. Traster, represented himself at trial. A jury found him guilty of two counts of grand theft by false pretenses. We will modify the judgment of conviction to reflect instead one count of grand theft by trick and one count of attempted grand theft by trick. Finding no other prejudicial error, we affirm as modified and remand for resentencing.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Count II—Alleged Theft at the Law Firm of Demler, Armstrong and Rowland:
Appellant had a computer consulting business he called Pen, Paper, Mouse Ink. In July 1997 the Long Beach law firm of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. CamodecaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. FendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. BeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Carrillo-Jaime v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- People v. FrederickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Kaufman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.